next up previous
Next: 6 Uncertainty for Measurements Up: A Plane Measuring Device Previous: 4 First and Second

5 The Covariance of the Estimated Homography

  In this section we compute the covariance of the homography H estimated from n image-world point correspondences. We consider all the computation points to be measured with error modelled as an homogeneous, isotropic Gaussian noise process. For the image computation points we define tex2html_wrap_inline2511, and for the world ones tex2html_wrap_inline2513. It is not strictly necessary to have such idealised distributions but this has not been found to be a restriction in practice.

From section 3.1 we seek the eigenvector tex2html_wrap_inline2381 with smallest eigenvalue tex2html_wrap_inline2517 of tex2html_wrap_inline1803. If the measured points are noise-free, or n = 4, then tex2html_wrap_inline1923 and in general we can assume that for tex2html_wrap_inline2381 the residual error tex2html_wrap_inline1927.

We now use matrix perturbation theory [7] to compute the covariance tex2html_wrap_inline2529 of tex2html_wrap_inline2381 based on this zero approximation. In a similar manner to [16], it can be shown that the tex2html_wrap_inline2533 covariance matrix tex2html_wrap_inline2529 is
 equation1236
where tex2html_wrap_inline1937, with tex2html_wrap_inline2563 the tex2html_wrap_inline2565 eigenvector of the tex2html_wrap_inline1803 matrix and tex2html_wrap_inline2569 the corresponding eigenvalue. S is the tex2html_wrap_inline2533 matrix:
 eqnarray930
with tex2html_wrap_inline2583 tex2html_wrap_inline2585 row vector of the A matrix and

tex2html_wrap_inline2589

The above theory has a double advantage over other methods such as [2, ] which require the inverse of tex2html_wrap_inline1803 in order to compute tex2html_wrap_inline2529. These methods are poorly conditioned if only four correspondences are used, or if n > 4 and the correspondences are (almost) noise-free. In both cases tex2html_wrap_inline1803 matrix is singular and thus is not invertible. Because the derivation of expression (7) has not involved the inverse, it is well conditioned in both these cases.


next up previous
Next: 6 Uncertainty for Measurements Up: A Plane Measuring Device Previous: 4 First and Second

Antonio Criminisi
Sun Jul 13 11:42:29 GMT 1997